5 Myths About Digital Accessibility, Debunked

Debunking myths about digital accessibility is crucial for promoting a more inclusive digital environment. These myths often serve as excuses to avoid the important process of making digital touchpoints accessible. Here are five common myths and the truths that dispel them:

1. Accessibility is Only for People with Disabilities 

Many believe that digital accessibility is solely for individuals with obvious disabilities, such as blindness or deafness. In reality, it benefits a wide range of users, including those with temporary disabilities (like a broken arm), situational limitations (like using a device in bright sunlight), or age-related issues (like decreased finger agility). There are also "invisible disabilities" that aren’t immediately apparent. For instance, a website with zoomable text aids not only those with visual impairments but also people reading from a mobile device in bright sunlight.

2. Accessibility Limits Design and Creativity 

Another myth is that following accessibility principles stifles creativity in design. In truth, accessibility can be seamlessly integrated in a visually appealing and creative manner. High-contrast colors, intuitive navigation, and responsive design are all elements that enhance both usability and aesthetics. A sleek, minimalist website design can include clear labels for keyboard navigation, making it both stylish and functional for users with motor disabilities.

3. Accessibility is Expensive and Complicated 

Many companies think that making their digital platforms accessible is too costly or technically challenging. While there may be an initial investment, integrating accessibility from the beginning of a project often reduces overall costs. Adapting existing products might require more resources, but using standards like the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) simplifies implementation. Like any improvement or new project, accessibility requires an initial investment, which should be considered a necessity rather than a secondary issue. For example, adding transcription during video production is much cheaper and simpler than doing it afterward.

4. Accessibility is a One-Time Task 

Some believe that once a digital product meets accessibility standards, no further action is needed. In reality, accessibility is an ongoing commitment. Regular updates are necessary to meet evolving standards, incorporate new technologies, and respond to user feedback. A website might initially be accessible, but it requires continuous reviews to ensure new features and content remain accessible.

5. Automatic Checks Ensure Accessibility 

While automatic tools are helpful, they cannot catch all accessibility issues. Some aspects, such as overall usability or intuitive navigation, require human evaluation. An automatic check might not detect whether the tabbing order on a webpage is logical and intuitive—this can only be assessed through manual testing.

Recognizing and addressing these myths is essential for making the Internet more accessible and inclusive. Embracing a comprehensive view of digital accessibility not only helps dispel these myths but also paves the way for digital products that are more accessible to a broader audience. The world is full of stereotypes and misconceptions — help us raise awareness of digital accessibility by sharing this information.

‍